Sunday, May 17, 2020

The Health Of The Canadian Health System - 1808 Words

Oral health is not considered an integral part of Canada s universal, publicly-funded health care regime. Dental care, outside of a hospital setting, does not constitute a ‘medically necessary’ service for the purpose of maintaining health as per the Canada Health Act (1964). There are three components to the Canadian health system that exist today: universal, publicly-funded coverage for physician and hospital services (known as Medicare); goods and services such as home care, long-term care, and prescription drugs which are funded either privately (through insurance or out-of-pocket), or publicly (through targeted subsidies or direct delivery programs); and finally, private health care services which include dental care.1 Costs for†¦show more content†¦in Finland, where up to 79 per cent of dental care is publicly-funded.3 A report issued by the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences states that six million Canadians per year avoid visiting a dental professional for cost reasons.2 While the private sector provides excellent quality of oral health care for its patients, many vulnerable groups have difficulty with access.2 It is also these vulnerable groups who demonstrate extremely high levels of oral health disease. According to a 2014 report issued by the Canadian Academy of Health Services (CAHS), the following represent Canada’s most vulnerable groups: individuals with low incomes; younger age children living in low-income families; individuals working without dental insurance; elderly populations with low incomes and/or living in institutions; aboriginal people, immigrants/refugees; people with disabilities; and, populations living in rural/remote communities.2 The CAHS authors report that increasingly and in light of challenging economic times, families from lower-middle income strata are also demonstrating difficulty with accessing oral health care (this is partially attributable to an increasing tendency toward part-time employment rather than fu ll-time employment with benefits). Oral health has many

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Does Binocular Rivalry Affect Our Conscious Perceptions

Binocular rivalry is the switching of perception between two images seen by the eyes simultaneously. Past research has indicated that some substances can affect binocular rivalry rate. In this study, we looked at the rate of binocular rivalry in undergraduate students when they had consumed either alcohol or caffeine, or were in a control group. We found that caffeine significantly sped up the rate of binocular rivalry, but that alcohol had no significant effect. This implies that substances may have an effect on perceptual switching and provides evidence for the different conditions that may affect our conscious perceptions. Introduction Binocular rivalry is a term used for the switching of perception between two different images that are simultaneously seen by the eyes. When this occurs, you are only conscious of one of these images at a time, with the dominant image switching between the two every few seconds. During binocular rivalry, either all or part of one of the images is suppressed from consciousness. There are three main properties of binocular rivalry; exclusivity, inevitability and stochasticity. Exclusivity means that only one image can be seen at a time, inevitability is that perception will always change at some point, as it is impossible to hold onto one image forever, and stochasticity is that switching will occur at unpredictable times (Fox and Herrmann, 1967). Many factors can influence the dominance of an image, including motion, contrast and salience.Show MoreRelatedThe Mechanics of Consciousness1571 Words   |  6 PagesConsciousness it is a state of awareness on both the external and internal actions and reaction toward different stimulus. Consciousness has greater impacts on our daily life and could influence survival of different organisms that lives on planet earth. The benefits is that it offers protection as it control the self .Consciousness regulate what we think and the reaction that we respond to the different experiences that we undergo on daily basis. Also, it allows us to either allow a thought or respond

Target From “Expect More” to “Pay Less” Essay Sample free essay sample

In this instance we examine Target. a price reduction retail merchant who was ever known for their ‘cheap chic’ . â€Å"Expect More. Pay Less† value proposition. Heavy investing into this value proposition positioned Target in the market in a non excessively distant 2nd place to WalMart with their slogan â€Å"Always Low Prices† . Over clip Target’s success led WalMart to mime certain facets of Target’s value proposition but shortly thenceforth the macroeconomic force of the â€Å"Great Recession† fell upon the market and WalMart seemed to reenforce its place of high quality. In response to this Target rolled out a new selling scheme which involved seting the spirit of its value proposition to entice clients who were seen to hold defected to their major rival. In this instance survey we shall analyze Target’s scheme in the face of these challenges and measure the effectivity of it against best selling patterns. What microenvironm ental factors have affected Target’s public presentation over the past few old ages? Four chief microenvironmental factors have affected Target’s public presentation in a negative manner over the past few old ages. 1. Rivals: Pre-recession. both Target and its chief rival. WalMart had good developed and communicated value propositions. Target’s being â€Å"Expect More. Pay Less† and WalMart taking the industry with â€Å"Always Low Prices† . Just before the recession hit WalMart modified their selling scheme by taking on some dogmas of Target’s manner and spirit by presenting new elements to its shop layout and merchandise lines. Now remember. the recession did non hit wholly without warning. Many people were cognizant of the possibility of a coming storm but it seems that WalMart was prepared with what has been its chief strength in the market†¦ low monetary values. Once the recession was in full swing consumers of course started to reexamine the manner in which their money was spent. hence a retail merchant with a long history of low monetary values and dollar stretching values seemed like a good spouse with which to sit out the economic storm. Target. unlucki ly was non maintaining their ears to the land and the recession found them losing market portion to their biggest rival. This of class was made worse when WalMart advertised monolithic monetary value â€Å"rollbacks† which could hold merely been a screen for taking Target spirit from their selling mix in an ambiance of renewed consumer frugalness. 2. Customers: Worsening grosss and net incomes led a post-recession Target to implement alterations to its selling scheme in order to repossess clients perceived to hold ‘defected’ to WalMart. This would propose that Target had lost sight of who its existent clients were and later launched a run that alienated some of their loyal. profitable client base ( termed. true friends ) . Long-time clients of Target whose positions resonated with their â€Å"Expect More. Pay Less† ethos found themselves confused as Target seemed to abandon them or worse. assumed they had developed the same gustatory sensations as the price reduction hungry frequenters of WalMart. In the face of the economic downswing and the altering positions of the buying public. Target should hold done more to pass on the nucleus portion of their value proposition. â€Å"Expect More† . This attack would non hold disengaged Target’s â€Å"true friend† clients and uninterrupted accent on value being one portion monetary value and two parts quality would hold been sufficient to change over the unpersuaded â€Å"butterflies† still shopping at WalMart. 3. The Company: The instance survey indicates that investors were non efficaciously engaged on the affair of the company’s new scheme in hard currency strapped times. Two points in the instance underscored this averment. In the subdivision titled â€Å" Mounting pressures† Target’s CEO. Gregg Steinhafel responded to debauched financials inquiring investors to be patient as WalMart had several decennaries to polish its cost construction with critical members of their supply concatenation. This is followed shortly by one of their major investors losing assurance in the board’s ability to maneuver the company back into the green. For any company in such an economic clime. inve stor assurance is really of import as such sweeping alterations as those taken by Target requires capital. This state of affairs would farther gnaw Target’s ability to redefine its value proposition to its clients. 4. Suppliers: Based on the fact that consumers were going thriftier as a whole. Target’s providers would hold been negatively affected both by the economic downswing and Target’s new selling scheme. Renewed force per unit area would hold put on these providers to assist carry through the displacement in focal point. In a hard economic environment providers would hold been asked to supply the same quality as earlier but at lower monetary values and in the face of plumping gross revenues. This all would hold been made worse by the renewed accent Target had placed on its shop trade name. What macroenvironmental factors have affected Target’s public presentation during that period? Demographics Target’s client mix chiefly consisted of Generations X’ers and Y’ers whereas WalMart’s client base consisted chiefly of Baby Boomers. Baby boomers were hit hard by the economic crisis when their retirement histories and place equities plummeted. The consequence of this being that the coevals of clients whose gustatory sensation for things immature and hip would hold probably led to Target’s voguish temptingness. had to squeeze pennies more than any member of the other two demographic groups. This would take them to vibrate more profoundly with the â€Å"Always low prices† value offered by WalMart. Coevals X’ers are more likely to analyze the value of merchandises in footings of both monetary value and quality. Target’s displacement in marketing focal point nevertheless would hold disengaged Generation X’ers as it made the two retail merchants far excessively similar in their offerings. This leaves Generation Y’ers. whose preference for 2-Way trade name relationships would necessitate a voguish reseller like Target to hold to court them with a strong web presence and prosecuting societal media runs. EconomicssIn 2008. the universe saw the worst economic downswing since the late thirtiess. This has affected shops similar Target as clients tend more towards economy and providers have a more hard clip supplying quality goods at good monetary values. By concentrating on the â€Å"Pay Less† portion of its motto. has Target pursued the best scheme? Why or why non? Target’s focal point on the â€Å"Pay Less† part of its value proposition is non the best scheme as it erodes the chiseled market place that the company held. As a consequence of this. they disengaged much of their loyal. profitable client base and finally started viing on the sod of their major. more successful rival utilizing similar tactics. What alternate scheme might Target hold followed in reacting to the first marks of worsening grosss and net incomes? Target should hold focused more on the â€Å"Expect More† part of its motto in order to retain its current clients while pass oning stairss taken to better overall value offered to clients by pull offing its supply concatenation spouses in order to cut down monetary values. This would guarantee that the client relationship is managed in a more effectual manner as net income borders could be maintained due to sustained client satisfaction whilst gross revenues are being bolstered by pulling new clients. They besides needed to acquire the investors on board with their schemes so as to guarantee they don’t develop the position that their investing is being wasted. A alteration in selling focal point peculiarly in unsmooth economic times will necessitate rather a spot of capital outgo therefore doing it critical to guarantee that investor assurance remains in tegral.